Культурные ценности. Цена и право
Шрифт:
Садиков О.H. Императивные нормы в международном частном праве // Московский журнал международного права. 1992. № 2. С. 71–84.
Свободу Ван Гогу! // Известия. 2005. 17 нояб. № 209. С. 1, 3.
Спесарев В.Л. Режимы виндикации и юридическое равенство сторон гражданско-правовых отношений // Правоведение. 1989. № 5. С. 90.
Советский энциклопедический словарь // гл. ред. A.M. Прохоров. 2-е изд. М.: Сов. энциклопедия, 1983. С. 1012.
Хпестова И.О. Иммунитет иностранного государства //
Эйтон-Шенкер Д. Справочная записка «Проблема прав человека и культурное разнообразие». ООН. 1996.
Ярошенко К.Б. Понятие и состав вреда в деликтных обязательствах // Проблемы современного гражданского права: сб. ст. М., 2000.
Noga без срока давности // Независимая газета. 2005. 17 нояб. С. 1, 6.
Noga замахнулась на святое. Арест собрания картин из ГМИИ им. Пушкина // Коммерсантъ. 2005. 17 нояб. № 216. С. 1, 4.
Adler В. The International Art Auction Industry: Has Competition Tarnished its Finish? // Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business. 2003. Vol. 23. P. 433.
An Auction Ring Alleged in Britain // ART Newsletter. 1985. Febr. 5.
Ashenfelter O., Graddy K. Anatomy of the Rise and Fall of a Price-Fixing Conspiracy: Auctions at Sotheby's and Christies // Journal of Competition Law and Economics. 2005. Vol. 1. P. 3–20.
Barker I. Thoughts of an Alternative Dispute Resolution Practitioner on an International ADR Regime for Reparation of Cultural Property and Works of Art // Art and Cultural Heritage. Law, Policy and Practice / B.T. Hoffman (ed.) Cambridge University Press, 2006. P. 484.
Bator P.M. An Essay on the International Trade in Art // Stanford Law Review. 1982. Vol. 34. P. 325–327.
B"uhring-Uhle С. Co-Med-Arb Technique Holds Promise for Getting Best of Both Worlds. World Arbitration Andmediation Report. Jan. 1992. P. 21.
Carducci G. The Growing Complexity of International Art Law: Conflict of Laws, Uniform Law, Mandatory Rules, UNSC Resolutions and EU Regulations // Art and Cultural Heritage: Law, Policy and practice / B.T. Hoffman (ed.). Cambridge University Press, 2006. P. 17, 69–78, 966.
Carter P. Transnational Trade in Works of Art: The Position in English Private International Law // Lalive P. International Sales of Works of Art. Geneva: Institute of International Business Law and Practice; Facult'e de Droit de Gen`eve, 1988. P. 322.
Carruthers J.M. Cultural Property and Law – an International Private Law Perspective // The Juridical Review. 2001. Pt3. P. 127–145.
Ch^atelain J. Synthesis // Lalive P. International Sales of Works of Art. Geneva: Institute of International Business Law and Practice; Facult'e de Droit de Gen`eve, 1988. P. 654.
Christies Conditions of Sale and Limited Warranty (2001) // Merryman J.H., Elsen A.E., Urice S.K. Law, Ethics and the Visual Art. 5th ed. Kluwer Law International, 2007. P. 1021.
Clay R. Who Owns Indian Artifacts? // The Christian Science Monitor. 1990. Aug. 28. P. 12.
Crossete B. Testing the Limits of Tolerance as Cultures Mix // New York Times. 1999. March 6.
Daes E.-I. Study on the Protection of the Cultural and Intellectual Property of Indigenous Peoples // UN. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub. 2/1993/28.
Daly
Farley C.H. Protecting Folklore of Indigenous Peoples: Is Intellectual Property the Answer? // Connecticut Law Review. 1997. Vol. 30. No. 1. P. 56–57.
Gegas E.L Note & Comment: International Arbitration and the Resolution of Cultural Property Disputes: Navigating the Stormy Waters Surrounding Cultural Property // Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution. 1997. Vol. 13. P. 154.
Gerstenblith P. Museums, the Market and Antiquities // University of Chicago Cultural Policy Workshop. 2000. March 2.
Harding S. Value, Obligation and Cultural Heritage // Arizona State Law Journal. 1999. Vol. 31. P. 291.
Hatch E. Culture and Morality: the Relativity of Values in Anthropology (1983) // Steiner HJ., Aston Ph. International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morality. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. P. 369.
Heritage Law Creation – Second Report. International Law Association Report of the Sixty-Eighth Conference. 1998. P. 217.
Hoffman B. International Art Transactions and the Resolution of Art and Cultural Property Disputes // Art and Cultural Heritage: Law, Policy and practice / B.T. Hoffman (ed.). Cambridge University Press, 2006. P. 168–169.
Institute of International Law. Twentieth Commission. Resolution 4. The Application of Foreign Public Law //Annuaire [session de Wiesbaden]. 1975. Vol. 56. P. 551–553.
Iraq (United Nations Sanctions) Order 2003. SI 2003/1519. Art. 8.
Italy Get Tough // The Art Newspaper. 1998. Vol. IX. No. 82. P. 1.
Kaplan N. Hong Kong and the UNCITRAL Model Law // Arbitration International. 1988. Vol. 4. P. 173, 176.
Koumantos G. International Legal Protection of Cultural Property: Introductory Report // International Legal Protection of Cultural Property: Proceedings of the 13. Colloquy on European Law. Delphi. Sept. 20–22. 1983. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Publications Section. 1984. 151 S. (Legal Affairs). P. 12–16.