Психология конфликта

Гришина Наталья Борисовна

NierenbergJ., Ross L. Women and the Art of Negotiating. New York, 1985.

Patterson G., Moore D. Interactive patterns as units of behavior // Social Interaction Analysis Methodological Issues/ Ed. by M. Lamb e. a. Univ. of Wisconsin Press, 1979. P. 77–96.

Prasow P. Conflict and Cooperation in Labor – Management Relations // Management of Conflict. Los Angeles, 1974.

PruittD. Negotiation Behavior. New York; London: Academic Press, 1981.

PruittD., KresselK. The Mediation of Social Conflict: An Introduction//Journal of Social Issues. 1985. Vol. 41. No. 2.

Rapoport A. Conflict in Man-Made Envirinment. Baltimore, 1974.

Roots of Agression. A re-examination of the Frustration-Agression Hypothesis / Ed. by Berkowitz L. New York, 1969.

Rubin J. Models of Conflict Management //Journal of Social Issues. 1994. Vol. 50. No. 1. P. 33–45.

Rubin J. Some Wise and Mistaken Assumptions About Conflict and Negotiation //Journal of Social Issues. 1989. Vol. 45. No. 2. P. 195–209.

Shaw M. E., Costanzo P. R. Theories of Social Psychology. New York, 1970.

Sherif M. Social Interaction. Process and Products. 1967.

Sillars A., WeisbergJ. Conflict as a Social Skill // Interpersonal Processes: New Directions in Communication Research. / Ed. by M. Roloff, G. Miller. Sage Publications, 1987. P. 140–171.

Smith E., Medin D. Categories and Concepts. L.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1981.

Stokols D. Group x Place Transactions: Some Neglected Issues in Psychological Research on Settings // Toward a Psychology of Situations: An Interpersonal Perspective. Hillsdate, 1981. P. 393–415.

Stryker S. Developments in

«two social psychologies // Toward an apprecation of mutual relevance / Sociometry 1977, 40.

Sullivan H. The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton, 1953.

TajfelH. The «New Look» and Social Differentiations: A Semi-Brunerian Perspective // The Social Foundations of Language and Thought / Ed. by Olson D., New York; London, 1980. P. 74–89.

TajfelH., ForgasJ. Social Categorization: Cognitions, Values and Groups // Social Cognition / Ed. by J. Forgas. London, 1981. P. 113–140.

Tajfel H.,JasparsJ., Eraser С The Social Dimension in European Social Psychology // The Social Dimension European Developments in Social Psychology. Vol. 1 / Ed. by H. Tajfel. Cambridge, 1984.

The International Encyclopedia of Sociology / Ed. by M. Mann. New York: Continuum, 1984.

The Social Science Encyclopedia. / Ed. by A. Kuper amp; J. Kuper. London etc.: Routledge amp; Kegan P., 1985

The Social Work Dictonary, 2nd ed. / Ed. by Barker R., NASW Press, 1991.

The Sociology of Georg Simmel / Translated, edited and with an introduction by K. Wolff. Glencoe, 1950.

Thomas W. The Unajusted Girl. Boston, 1923. Цит. по: ИонииЛ. Е. Понимающая социология. Историко-критический анализ. М., 1979.

Thomas W., Znaniecki F. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. New York: Dover, 1958. Vol. 1–2.

Tiffin J., McCormick E.J. Industrial Psychology. 1965.

Tjosvold D. van der Vilert E. Applying Cooperative and Competitive Conflict Theory to Mediation // Psychological Abstracts. April, 1995. Vol. 82. No. 4. P. 1645.

Vander Zanden J. Social Psychology. New York: McGraw Hill, 1987

VossJ., Wiley J. Acquiring Intellectual Skills // Annual Review of Psychology. 1995. Vol. 46. P. 155–181.

Wall J., Rude D. Judical Mediation: Techniques, Strategies, and Situational Effects //Journal of Social Issues. 1985. Vol. 41. No. 2. P. 47–63.

Weingart L., Bennett R., Brett J. The Impact of Consideration of Issues and Motivational Orientation on Group Negotiation Process and Outcome // Journal of Applied Psychology. 1993. Vol. 78. No. 3. P. 504–517.

Worterbuch der Soziologie. Stuttgart, 1969. Цит. по: НечипоренкоЛ. А. Буржуазная «социология конфликта». М.: Политиздат, 1982. С. 41.

Yalom I. Existential Psychoterapy 1980.

Zimbardo Ph. Preface // Ch. Maslasch, Burnout – The Cost of Caring. New Jersey, 1982.

Примечания

1

В юбилейном издании американского социологического журнала, посвященного столетию со дня рождения Зиммеля, его даже называют «Фрейдом в исследовании общества», проводя паралелль между плодотворностью фрейдовской концепции сновидения как проявления неосознанных мотивов индивида и значением идеи Зиммеля об отражении определенных групповых процессов в символических формах игры (Mills, 1958, р. 643).

2

Мы приводим английский аналог обозначения этих понятий в силу различия терминов, используемых в литературе, на что указывает и сам Дойч.