The person as the hologram
Шрифт:
This beingness is manifested in the form of star systems with planets, part of which at a certain stage of development is suitable for existence and development of living beings of the most different type according to the program which is available for them, coded in a genome, allowing to copy itself by reproduction of this or that type. These organisms have the sense organs, information processing centers, they possess ability to reproduction, metabolism, and they don't exist outside communities.
At this each living being according to available at it sense organs and information processing centers forms own time, and all their set, making a whole in a holographic projection, forms the general (external) time [4, chaper 6].
The similar dual system allows to Uniform to appear in existence, and to the active (consciousness) – to live and develop in the finite, temporary, in other words – to develop discretely, but infinitely.
It is clear from this preamble that living beings give in themselves the finite life to consciousness, a break in which (death) means only updating of each individual consciousness.
Along with that living beings are the basis of all beingness without which it isn't capable to exist inasmuch only through them fragments of the passive from Uniform are converted into things, i.e. into material beingness known to us.
Thus, there is no need to guess by what wonderful way was formed the genome without which the living being is impossible and which could self-assembled approximately with the same probability what aircraft carrier with all planes onboard.
Life is a basis of Creation which without it doesn't exist.
Therefore the statement about a life origin from lifeless matter is senseless. Life and things are incapable to exist in beingness independently inasmuch beingness is based on their interaction, being continuous manifestation of the passive from Uniform through the active of a holographic projection of Uniform.
Aggregation of the active and the passive in beingness, i.e. in time, actually, constitutes the infinite, but discrete process of development and expression of the active (consciousness) in the environment from the resisting things (the passive) at the competition of representatives of consciousness in this environment.
The holographic essence of a projection of Uniform is reflected in beingness not only on coincidence of each particle of beingness with the whole – by all hologram, but also externally expressed in similarity of the simplest structures of beingness and in fractality of its more difficult structures.
Fractality is characterized by complicated similarity of the some kind, more precisely, – by self-similarity of part and whole too: the whole completely or almost completely coincides with the part or parts (has the same form) with dimension, bigger dimension of topological spaces.
Crones of trees, blood system of animals, clouds, snowflakes and many other objects are fractal.
Therefore for bigger clarity in understanding of this or that process or some difficult structure it makes sense to address to analogies on the basis of this similarity.
In this case the state of the living being in Creation can be compared to work of a television receiver in a network (the computer on Internet).
Let us choose for convenience of comparison a living being having the vision.
This being in relation to the visual perception of the environment reminds the television receiver combined with a television camera which (eyes) catches the pulse signals going further to the processing centers (the relevant departments of a brain), converting these signals-packets of information into the moving image.
Eyes like a television camera catch signals in certain range of frequencies (light). Eyes of the person, for example, don't fix light in the infrared range.
Thus, the person through eyes can obtain only information, predetermined by opportunities of own eyes and no more. Thereby he isn't capable to see the radiations in another range of frequencies and to see the objects reflecting these radiations or radiating them. In this regard, the world (environment) for him is narrowed by opportunities of his sense organs.
People believe, to all appearances, that these signals go from objects, outsiders and independent of them, in the form of light reflected from objects, in particular, and therefore that all people see seemingly same objects before themselves, and they before them do not disappear.
Indeed, exactly thus the world is manifested for us, but it would be desirable to learn that is behind this.
The science, alas, has stopped on the fact of this phenomenon and hasn't gone further, motivating such approach by lack of a possibility of experimental check of what stands behind the manifesting.
Kant called this – the inaccessible for sensations of the person – "thing in itself" (transcendental object).
As for the objects surrounding us, independent existence of objects of strictly certain forms, by which they appear to us, is very doubtful concerning other living beings.
The matter is that beings of different types in own way perceive the same subject within its kind – and concerning its sizes, color, smell, form, permeability and – even in relation to its existence, that is determined by opportunities of a concrete being to convert the arriving signals into the data which is understandable to it from a position of usefulness for his life-activity, i.e. into information. This process of obtaining and converting the information into own surroundings are based on the action of the sense organs and the information processing centers of the organism.
If we return to the comparison of a living being with a TV set equipped with a TV camera (the computer with a camcorder), then, unlike it, for example, the person has no separate external screen monitor on which he could watch both environmental, and himself from outside. Therefore in case of open eyes in front of him has a partial view of the surroundings and own body.
It means that, unlike the screen of the TV, the person shows to himself of himself as if from self in action in own "now".