Что там – за словом? Вопросы интерфейсной теории значения слова
Шрифт:
52. Ghyselinck, M., Custers, R. & Brysbaert, M. Age-of-acquisition ratings for 2322 Dutch words from 40 different semantic categories // Psychologica Belgica. – 2003. – Vol.43. – Pp. 181–214.
53. Ghyselinck, M., De Moor, W. & Brysbaert, M. Age-of-acquisition ratings for 2816 Dutch four– and fiveletter nouns // Psychologica Belgica. – 2000. – Vol.40. –Pp. 77–98.
54. Gilhooly, K.J. & Logie, R.H. Age of acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity and ambiguity measures for 1944 words // Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation. – 1980. – Vol. 12. – Pp. 395–427.
55. Guida, A., & Lenci, A. Semantic properties of word associations to Italian verbs // Italian Journal of Linguistics. – 2007. – Vol. 19. – Pp. 293–326.
56. Hamp, B., & Feldweg, H. GermaNet – a lexical-semantic net for German // Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Automatic Information Extraction and Building Lexical Semantic Resourses for NLP Applications. – Madrid, Spain, 1997. – Pp. 9–15.
57. Hirsh, K.W. & Tree, J. Word association norms for two cohorts of British adults // Journal of Neurolinguistics. – 2001. – Vol. 14(1). – Pp. 1–44.
58. Howard, D.V. Restricted word association norms for adults between the ages of 20 and 80 // JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology. – 1980. – Vol. 10. – № 6.
59. Izura, C., Hernndez-Munoz, M., & Ellis, A.W. Category norms for 500 Spanish words in five semantic categories // Behavior Research Methods. – 2005. – Vol. 37. – Pp. 385–397. [Электронный
60. .Jenkins, J. The 1952 Minnesota word association norms // Postman, L. & Keppel, G. (Eds.). Norms of Word Association. – New York; London:: Academic Press, 1970.
61. Jenkins, J., & Russell, W.A. Systematic changes in word association norms: 1910 – 1952 // Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. – 1960. – Vol. 60.
62. Joyce, T. Constructing a large-scale database of Japanese word associations // Glottometrics. – 2005. – Vol. 10. – Pp. 82–98.
63. Kent, G.H, & Rosanoff, A.J. A study of associations in insanity. I. Association in normal subjects // American Journal of Insanity. – 1910. – Vol. 67. – Pp. 37–96; 317–390.
64. Kerr, N.H., & Johnson, T.H. Word norms for blind and sighted subjects: Familiarity, concreteness, meaningfulness, imageability, imagery modality, andword association // Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. – 1991. – Vol. 23. – Pp. 461–485.
65. Kiss, G., Armstrong, C., Milroy, R. & Piper, J. The Associative Thesaurus of English. – Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, MRC Speech and Communication Unit, 1972. – 1539 p.
66. Kurcz, I. Polskie normy powszechno'sci skojarze'n swobodnych na 100 slow z listy Kent-Rosanoffa // Studia psychologiczne. – Warzawa, 1967. – T. VIII (Nadbitka). – 255 s.
67. Lahl, O., G"oritz, A.S., Pietrowsky, R. & Rosenberg, J. Using the World-Wide Web to obtain large-scale word norms: 190,212 ratings on a set of 2,654 German nouns // Behavior Research Methods. – 2009. – Vol. 41 (1). – Pp. 13–19.
68. Lambert, W.E. & Mоогe, N. Word-association responses: Comparisons of American and French monolinguals with Canadian monolinguals and bilinguals // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966. – Vol. 3. – Pp. 313–320.
69. Magyar verb'alis asszoci'acik 1 [Hungarian Verbal Associations 1 / Ed. By Ball, L.]. – Szeged, Budapest, Debrecen: Juh'asz Gyula Tan'ark'epz~o F~oiskola, 1983. – 210 p.
70. Magyar verb'alis asszoci'acik 2 [Hungarian Verbal Associations 2 / Ed. By Ujvari, C.]. – Szeged, Budapest, Debrecen: Juh'asz Gyula Tan'ark'epz~o F~oiskola, 1985. – 204 p.
71. Mars'alov'a, L. Slovno-associacn'e normy II. V–IX trieda ZDS a vysok'a skola. – Bratislava: Univerzita Komensk'eho v Bratislave, 1974. – 497 s.
72. Marques, J.F., Fonseca, F.L., Morais, A.S., & Pinto, I.A. Estimated age of acquisition norms for 834 Portuguese nouns and their relation with other psycholinguistic variables // Behavior Research Methods. – 2007. – Vol. 39. – Pp. 439–444.
73. McEvoy, C.l. & Nelson, D.L. Category name and instance norms for 106 categories of various sizes // American Journal of Psychology. – 1982. – Vol. 95. – Pp.581–634.
74. McRae, K., Cree, G., Seidenberg, M., & McNorgan, C. Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things // Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers. – 2005. – Vol. 37(4). – Pp. 547–559.
75. Melinger, A. & Weber, A. Database of noun associations for German (2006) URL: www.coli.unisaarland.de/projects/nag/.
76. Morrison, C.M., Chappell, T.D. & Ellis, A.W. Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables // The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. – 1997. – Vol. 50A. – Pp. 528–559.
77. Nelson, D.L., McEvoy, C.L., & Schreiber, T.A. The University of South Florida Word Association, Rhyme, and Word Fragment Norms (1998). URL: http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
78. Novak, Z. Volne slovni p'aroveasociace v cestine. – Praha, 1988.
79. Paivio, A., Yuille, J.C. & Madigan, S. Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns // Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement. – 1968. – Vol. 70. – № 1, Pt. 2. – Pp. 1–25.
80. P'erez, M.A., & Navaln, C. Objective-AoA norms for 175 names in Spanish: Relationship with other psycholinguistic variables, estimated AoA, and data from other languages // Cognitive Psychology. – 2005. – Vol. 17. – Pp. 179–206.