New – by the opposite – proof of the presence of God
Шрифт:
On the other hand, the experimental verification of the ideas proposed by Locke is the rejection of the concept of "innate ideas": “… men, barely by the use of their natural faculties, main attain to all the knowledge they have, without the help of only of any innate impressions; and may arrive at certainly, without any such original notions or principles” [7, p. 7].
In this opinion Locke both is right, and isn't right, inasmuch the crux of the matter consists in – to whom should be attributed these form-building abilities or ideas.
In human consciousness these form-building abilities or ideas are hidden, more precisely, directly they can't be manifested, so how the person is obliged to start acting in life with "blank sheet", to find new ways, but not to be under the influence of already known. Along with that, "congenital ideas", and actually form-building abilities of single consciousness, are a basis of all real, inasmuch the lifeless matter can't produce any ideas, unlike consciousness. Therefore, single consciousness, which is present at each person, forms all environment, surrounding him, through his sensations on the basis of the passive from Uniform.
Single consciousness in a varying degree understands itself and understands that it wants and can, and, as a result, it finds ways of own development both on own level, and on the level of each individual consciousness in the environment which except it couldn't be formed on own projects.
Our reasoning and digression to history lead to thought, that there are two levels of consciousness – the lowest, which includes all the living, self-perpetuating, adapting to the environment, changing in it, acting instinctively and reflexively, perceiving the fact of own existence at the level of sensations; and the highest level of consciousness which differs from the lowest only by the fact that to the perception of sensation is added the awareness of self, expressed not only in thinking, the speech, but also in imagination, memory, different experiences and passions, will, perpetual aspiration to liberty against any order.
Any consciousness, and not just human consciousness, produces own world, copying and receiving every moment via channels of the sense organs which are available for own carrier, of course, not a direct image of all Uniform, which is the infinite, but, receiving display of those fragments from Uniform which this individual consciousness is capable to identify and bind with the hidden help of single consciousness.
All this initial copying of the recognizable fragments from Uniform any individual consciousness carries out automatically as it can, according to own level of development, own sense organs, but in contact with single consciousness, inasmuch individual consciousness in the carrier, whether it be a bacterium or the person, in a separation from single consciousness can't deploy a full picture of own world in the present, formed by it, and it also doesn't exist in a separation from single consciousness, making in the holographic projection not its part, but being by single consciousness self.
The living beings without self-consciousness are completely subordinated to the need in the world which is manifested through their sense organs without realizing itself.
However, the living beings without self-consciousness potentially comprise the germ of liberty so how they at own level through own sense organs by means of single consciousness forms own time of life, own environment and seeks to survive in it.
But the living beings without self-consciousness do not yet have the opportunity to be aware of itself in this world, unlike the beings understanding self. Nevertheless, any "simple" living being differs from a thing, inasmuch it senses and has the master intellect according to which it can adequately act in the world of the phenomena, without going deep into their essence. Thereby any "simple" living being is a threshold of the highest consciousness, without which the last isn't capable to manifest, inasmuch only the living being has sense organs, and without sensations and the person and any other organism, understanding itself, can't "enter" into existence into the real, moving world.
As a rule, self-consciousness is manifested in the living beings without self-consciousness on the highest level of their developments. These beings are used by the highest consciousness which is taking root into them as a basis for development of the got formation. Therefore, single consciousness primarily copies itself in the form of the living beings without self-consciousness in the "external" world formed by him as uniform consciousness providing the living beings suitable conditions for gradual development, which is expressed in creation by each living organism of his "now" within "the external". Actually, development of the living organism consists in reworking by its consciousness of the reality formed by it as being updated "now", in every moment which consciousness through sensations "replaces" gradually and consistently copies of previous objects of environment on objects, which provide to it the best adaptability by environment and the most favorable living conditions.
Thereby any living being changes self, fighting against other types of the living beings, perishing and appearing in new quality, but in general the living beings is in a progressive trend. All this is satisfactorily studied and described by the evolutionary theory, except an explanation of emergence the living beings and emergence among living beings of the person who, having self-consciousness, refuses simply to adapt to the environment, but begins to change it purposefully.
As a result, the volume of information received by each person and human communities in general grows with big acceleration, than for the living beings without self-consciousness, more and more condensing time and eventually leading of human communities in our three-dimensional measurement to disintegration owing to the information collapse, or accumulation of excess information which consciousness of the person is not able to "digest" [8, chapter V].
Thus, the being with self-consciousness differs from other living beings only by understanding ourselves, from which grows all its aspirations, and which are based on dissatisfaction of consciousness by itself, meaning its initial activity which is expressed in impossibility of this being to live, simply adapting to the environment. It acquires requirement to change this environment and to change itself together with it, and thus to develop, not following the only need to adapt to the existing order.
This conscious aspiration to change all existing, to liberation from former, to its replacement by other is the finding of liberty by any being with self-consciousness. Liberty of any individual consciousness is anyway manifested in these conscious decisions. During this process the consciousness enriches itself. At the same time liberty gives to the person the chance to live as he wants within surrounding reality if the person, the consciousness carrier, is able, more precisely, is capable to dispose by this gift adequately.
Liberty does not require "to attribute" it to the person as "transcendental object" ("thing-in-itself"), i.e. to believe that the person is free only in the intelligible world. Any self-conscious being is freely always and everywhere owing to understanding of itself, understanding of own existence in the world: it always comes to decisions self, it self and is responsible for them in any sphere – practical or intellectual. And it is unimportant, are available on it the reasons or these decisions are spontaneous; the important thing is that in the consciousness of the person as the exponent of activity of consciousness "sits" perpetual dissatisfaction, without which he would turn into the stupid cattle, chewing the same cud, that can be very pleasant. Exactly it is the expression of his liberty and for this reason he has an opportunity not simply to live, and consciously to develop himself and don't stand still [9, chapters I-II]/