Чтение онлайн

на главную

Жанры

Parallel Worlds pro et contra
Шрифт:

– Look, you've got me all worked up. What's the real deal?

– First, recognize the fact: whoever thinks for you is in power.

– That's such an incredible thing to say, it just delighted me.

– Don't make fun of me. Thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal – these are also basic truths, but people only prove their stupidity by saying that, you see, God himself should tell them all these things. Imagine if intelligent beings from other worlds come to us and ask: "What are your greatest truths?" And we'll say, "Thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal. They will think, "What savages live here.

Ruthra and the doctor grinned.

– Now the next one, no less fantastic than our entire program. You may laugh at first, but I thought that everything happening on Earth was not conceived by us. We're not so bad, we're not completely stupid. Realistically why would we, for one thing, spend so much money creating weapons? Why create so many things that can destroy the world several times over? Why? After all, you can produce exactly enough to be enough for one time, and do not spend more. Although that's completely idiotic. Logically, weapons of mass destruction should destroy no more than 30 percent of humanity. But that's not enough, we want to kill all people, and with a 500-percent guarantee. Don't you think that's clearly not what people want? Don't you think that someone has put it in people's minds? It's not logical to create a weapon for defense that will kill you. Is it or isn't it?

– Yeah, I'm getting into it. I understand the logic. Now I need to figure out why we did it.

– In addition, we have created a system that does not obey us, motivated by the fact that the enemy can kill us stealthily, bribe someone, disable signaling and command networks, so the machine should be given the right to kill all of humanity without us, as if in retaliation. Isn't that the ravings of a madman?

– I don't think we're crazy. Who put this idea in us?

– I think it all happens before, in the world from which we are mirrored. Or even more precisely, in the world from which the world from which we are reflected is reflected.

– Interesting. Now it's all lining up in a chain. So you want to send a man down there to make a difference? Make that world safe first?

– Exactly.

– If you say such a thing to someone, it's just the finish line. Although if we imagine, say, even in the developed Roman Empire, modern capabilities, such as determining gender in the womb, the ability to make medical diagnoses, launching satellites to detect natural disasters, supersonic flight, and flight in general, it would be something equally incredible. With all of this, it would be possible to change a reality that has not yet come to pass.

– Now, to be honest, that's not what's on my mind right now. We need to actually try an experiment. Here's my proposal. First, we conduct everything in Earth conditions, with us and our trusted assistants participating. Second, let's try the Earth-to-space option. Third, let's launch someone into these parallel worlds.

– What if we get in the wrong place?

– According to my calculations, we can't get to the wrong place. The entangled pair… that is, the second part of that pair is already there, so the path is already there. Some kind of route line. So the change signals sent from here will be reflected there. Don't you get my idea? The system works like a flashlight and the area it illuminates. The flashlight sends out a beam and it's there instantly. We generate these particles here, and their entangled pairs are already there. They're not wandering around somewhere. These worlds are really interconnected.

– I wish I could figure out how.

– Yeah, that's the whole question. Even you and I can't understand how it can happen between coupled pairs. How they pass on their condition to each other....

The doctor exhaled heavily.

– Let's give it a shot. Draw a plan.

– Okay, I'm running Irene to find a candidate based on the criteria we need. By the way, we need to discuss them with psychologists and such. The criteria themselves. I'll tell you my requirements. I originally thought of sending a boy of about 5-10 years old. If something goes wrong during our experiment, the child would grow up during this time, maybe become a "luminary of science" like you, and then create a similar installation and return back… or, if there was a catastrophe there, at least be able to come up with a similar technology, as we have, and develop a theory of displacement. But now I'm of a different opinion. I'll send a lady, determined, ambitious, not without a desire for scientific advancement. She can, in case of emergency, give birth and prepare a child. Then we have even more time. Even if the worlds are the same, it doesn't mean there's no variant of reflection warp… I've calculated the possible probability of a warp connection between these electrons in flight. It's all God knows where. Through the universe, like soil, ocean, volcano, wild animals, war, disease, cold, heat, go through the universe and not change? No way. You know what I mean? The signal will get into the field of influence of radiation, and quasars, and black holes, and gravity of galaxies… A minimal change there – and here it will be not a slap, but a shot from a cannon. A kiss there and a carnival there, a quarrel there and an international scandal there. After all, let's say that the same statement can be transmitted to another person, for example, with a changed intonation, and the perception, and consequently the emotional state, will be different. Correspondingly, the action from the received signal may be different as well.

– I understood you a long time ago. That is, someone said "I wish him dead" to someone, and a third person passed it on: "This person is going to kill you, he wishes you dead".

– Something like that. Or a girl smiles – and you've already decided that she wants you, ready to marry you.

They grinned again. The scientist decided to give his version:

– What if it's the other way around?

– Also an option.

– Let's do it this way: you are engaged in the search for a candidate, moral and moral preparation and, of course, the scientific side, you will not be only among the female students of the physics department to look for a candidate, and I'm the technical part.

They again "diluted" a serious topic with laughter.

– Let's go.

– Grapefruit juice and chess tonight.

– The fighting will be fierce.

– Uh-oh.

Chapter 9. We choose, we are chosen....

They said goodbye. Ruthra went to his room. On the way out, he asked Irene:

– Did you listen to the dialog?

He knew, of course, that she was listening and taking notes. He asked more out of habit, because the manner of dialog typical of humans was different. And it had been developed over millennia. Now the appearance of a new interlocutor, moreover, exactly the same as a human, except for the body, could not change this established manner. The AI was already perceived as a friend, comrade, employee, colleague, subordinate, advisor.

– Yeah, like always.

– What do you say to the idea of picking a lady?

– I approve. I already did.

Ruthra paused.

– How?

– I only had about 8 billion people to go through. And with your recommendations, it's less than a billion. And if we take into account the combination of connections and relationships in these connections, then very few people fit the criteria.

– Under what criteria?

– You said it before. There should be a woman whose advice would be listened to by the second one, that is, a friend with a similar way of thinking, with experience and moral qualities. Another friend also with similar parameters…so again, both with experience and moral qualities. There must be a kinship in ethical, moral, spiritual parameters. Accordingly, in age, in religion, in nationality. In addition, there should be a man who understands technical and scientific issues. Women should know him well and treat him with respect, as the eldest of the group.

– To the head of the group? Why?

– If one of them is the eldest in the group, it will lead to conflict later on. Each of them has to play their own role. They should accept their roles from the beginning and treat them as a given. For example, according to your plan, one woman will be in charge of the experiment. You are going to send one to the parallel worlds, aren't you?

– The plan is one for now, and then we'll see how it goes. We don't know anything yet. For example, if we put one of our ladies in one of our friends here. It turns out that now she has to know the previous dialogues with her friends here at our place. And so, it turns out that all of them are strangers for this woman, who should be influenced there.

Поделиться:
Популярные книги

Авиатор: назад в СССР 12+1

Дорин Михаил
13. Покоряя небо
Фантастика:
попаданцы
альтернативная история
5.00
рейтинг книги
Авиатор: назад в СССР 12+1

Третий

INDIGO
Фантастика:
космическая фантастика
попаданцы
5.00
рейтинг книги
Третий

В зоне особого внимания

Иванов Дмитрий
12. Девяностые
Фантастика:
попаданцы
альтернативная история
5.00
рейтинг книги
В зоне особого внимания

Кровавая весна

Михайлов Дем Алексеевич
6. Изгой
Фантастика:
фэнтези
9.36
рейтинг книги
Кровавая весна

Неудержимый. Книга XVIII

Боярский Андрей
18. Неудержимый
Фантастика:
фэнтези
попаданцы
аниме
5.00
рейтинг книги
Неудержимый. Книга XVIII

Вперед в прошлое!

Ратманов Денис
1. Вперед в прошлое
Фантастика:
попаданцы
5.00
рейтинг книги
Вперед в прошлое!

Начальник милиции. Книга 3

Дамиров Рафаэль
3. Начальник милиции
Фантастика:
попаданцы
альтернативная история
5.00
рейтинг книги
Начальник милиции. Книга 3

Не грози Дубровскому!

Панарин Антон
1. РОС: Не грози Дубровскому!
Фантастика:
фэнтези
попаданцы
аниме
5.00
рейтинг книги
Не грози Дубровскому!

Свадьба по приказу, или Моя непокорная княжна

Чернованова Валерия Михайловна
Любовные романы:
любовно-фантастические романы
5.57
рейтинг книги
Свадьба по приказу, или Моя непокорная княжна

Муж на сдачу

Зика Натаэль
Любовные романы:
любовно-фантастические романы
5.00
рейтинг книги
Муж на сдачу

Кодекс Крови. Книга I

Борзых М.
1. РОС: Кодекс Крови
Фантастика:
фэнтези
попаданцы
аниме
5.00
рейтинг книги
Кодекс Крови. Книга I

Польская партия

Ланцов Михаил Алексеевич
3. Фрунзе
Фантастика:
попаданцы
альтернативная история
5.25
рейтинг книги
Польская партия

Лорд Системы

Токсик Саша
1. Лорд Системы
Фантастика:
фэнтези
попаданцы
рпг
4.00
рейтинг книги
Лорд Системы

Газлайтер. Том 2

Володин Григорий
2. История Телепата
Фантастика:
попаданцы
альтернативная история
аниме
5.00
рейтинг книги
Газлайтер. Том 2