Методология экономической науки
Шрифт:
Hendry D. F. and Ericsson N. R.., 1991. An econometric analysis of U.K. money demand in Monetary Trends in the United States and the United Kingdom by Milton Friedman and Anna J. Schwartz. American Economic Review, 81 (1), 8—38.
Hennipman P., 1976. Pareto optimality: value judgement or analytical tool. In Relevance and Precision. From Quantitative Analysis to Economic Policy. J. S. Cramer, A. Heertje and P. Venekamp (eds.). Amsterdam: North–Holland, 39—69.
Hesse M., 1973. Reasons and evaluation in the history of science. In Changing Perspectives in the History of Science. M. Teich and R. Young (eds.). Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 127–147.
Hicks J. R., 1956. Revisions of Demand Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
— 1965. Capital and Growth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
— 1973. Capital and Time. A Neo–Austrian Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hindess
Harvester Press. Hirsch A., 1978. J. E. Cairnes' methodology in theory and practice. History of Political
Economy, 10, 322—328. Hirsch A. and Hirsch E., 1975. The methodological implications of Marshall's
economics. In International Congress of Economic History and History of Economic
Theories in Piraeus. L. Houmanidis (ed.). Piraeus: Piraeus Graduate School of
Industrial Studies, 134—152.
— 1976. The heterodox methodology of two Chicago economists. In The Chicago
School of Political Economy. W. J. Samuels (ed.). East Lansing: Association for
Evolutionary Economics and Michigan State University, 59—78.
Hirsch A. and de Marchi N., 1986. Making a case when theory is unfalsifmble. Economics and Philosophy, 2 (1), 1—21.
— 1990. Milton Friedmen. Economics in Theory and Practice. London: Harvester
Wheatsheaf.
Hogarth R. M. and Reder M. W. (eds.), 1987. Rational Choice. The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hollander S., 1977. Adam Smith and the self–interest axiom. Journal of Law and Economics, 20, 133—152.
— 1985. The Economics of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press,
2 vols.
Hollis M. and Nell E. J., 1975. Rational Economic Man. A Philosophical Critique of Neo–Classical Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoover K. D., 1988. The New Classical Macroeconomics: A Sceptical Inquiry. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
— 1991. Scientific research program or tribe? A joint appraisal of Lakatos and the
new classical macroeconomics. In de Marchi and Blaug, 1991, 367—397.
Houthakker H. S., 1961. The present state of consumption theory. Econometrica, 29,
704–740. Howson
Cambridge University Press. Hudson W. D., 1969. The Is–Ought Question. A Collection of Papers on the Central
Problem in Moral Philosophy. London: Macmillan. Hutchison T. W., 1938. The Significance and Basic Postulates of Economic Theory.
New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1965.
— 1941. The significance and basic postulates of economic theory: a reply to Professor
Knight. Journal of Political Economy, 49, 732—750.
1953. A Review of Economic Doctrines, 1870—1929. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
1956. Professor Machlup on verification in economics. Southern Economic Journal,
22. Reprinted in Caldwell, 1984, 118–125 and Hausman, 1984, 188–197.
I960. Methodological prescriptions in economics: a reply. Economica, 27, 158—161.
1964. «Positive» Economics and Policy Judgements. London: Allen & Unwin.
1966. Testing economic assumptions: a comment. Journal of Political Economy, 74,
81–83.
1973. Some themes from Investigations into Method. In Carl Menger and the Austrian
School of Economics. J. R. Hicks and W. Weber (eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
1977. Knowledge and Ignorance in Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
1978. On Revolutions and Progress in Economic Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
1988. The case for falsification. In de Marchi, 1988, 169—182.
1992a. Changing Aims in Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
1992b. Hayek and «modern Austrian» methodology. Comment on a non–refuting
refutation. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 10, W. J.
Samuels (ed.). Greenwich, CN: JAl Press.
Jenkin F., 1867. The origin of species. North British Review. Reprinted in Darwin