Транспорт в городах, удобных для жизни
Шрифт:
Department of Transport. Buses. – London, UK: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office (HMSO), 1984.
Domstad Ragnar. Development of light rail in Gothenburg. Paper presented at conference, «The Tram in Middle-Size European Cities». – Padua, Italy, 1991.
Domstad Ragnar. Tendering for buss services in Gothenburg. – Gothenburg, Sweden: Gothenburg City Traffic Authority, 1996.
European Marketing Data and Statistics. – London., UK: Euromonitring Publications. 1995. Vol. 30.
Fawkner J. Bus deregulation in Britain: profit or loss? / Public Transport International. 1995. Vol. 44 (November). Р. 18-23.
Hall Peter, Carmen Hass-Klau. Can rail save the city? The impact of rail transit and pedes-trianization on British and German cities. – Aldershot, UK: Gower Press, 1985.
Hollantz and Tamms. Die Kommunalen Verhehrsprobleme in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. – Essen, Germany: Vulkan-Verlag, 1965.
Homburger W. S., Vukan R. Vuchic. Transit Federation – a solution for service integration / Revue de l’UITP 2. – Brussels, Belgium: Union Internationale des Transports Publics (UITP), 1972. Р 73-100.
Hook Walter. Role of nonmotorized transportation and public transport in Japan’s economic success / TR Record 1441.—Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, 1994. p. 108 – 115.
Lehner Friedrich. Public transport within framework of urban general traffic plans. Report I. 34th International Congress of Union Internationale des Transports Publics (UITP). – Copenhagen, Denmark, Brussels, Belgium: UITP, 1961.
Lehner Friedrich. Regional organization of transport and urban development. Report Ia. 38th International Congress of Union Internationale des Transports Publics (UITP). – London, UK, Brussels, Belgium: UITP, 1969.
Matshoukis E. C., van Gent H. A. A comparative study of the environmental impacts of transport policies in the Netherlands and Greece / IATSS Research. 1995. Vol. 19, N 1.
Monheim Rolf. From pedestrian zones to traffic-calmed city centers / Harry Dimitrou (ed.) Moving away from the motor vehicle: the German and Hong Kong experience. – Hong Kong: Centre of Urban Planning and Environmental Management, University of Hong Kong, 1994.
New South Wales Department of Transport. Integrated transport strategy for Greater Sydney. First release for public discussion. – Sydney, Australia: New South Wales Department of Transport, 1993.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Energy prices and taxes. – Paris, France: International Energy Agency. N 3. 1992.
Perl Anthony, Pucher John. Transit in trouble: the policy challenge posed by Canada’s changing urban mobility / Canadian Public Policy. 1995. Vol. 23, N 3 (September).
Pickup Laurie, et al. Bus deregulation in the metropolitan areas. – Aldershot, UK and Brookfield, VT: Averbury / Gower, 1991.
Pucher John. Urban travel behavior as the outcome of public policy: the example of modal split in Western Europe and North America /Journal of the American Planning Association. 1988. Vol. 54, N 4 (Autumn). Р 509-520.
Pucher John. Public transport developments: Canada vs. the United States / Transportation Quarterly. 1994. Vol. 48, N 1. Р 65– 78.
Pucher John. Urban passenger transport in the United States and Europe: a comparative analysis of public policies / Transport Review. 1995. Vol. 5, N 2 (April-June). Р. 89– 107; and Vol. 15, N 3 (July-September). Р 261-283.
Roodman David M. Getting the signals right: tax reform to protect the environment and economy. Worldwatch Paper 134.—Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute, 1997. May.
Socialdata. Verkehr in Stuttgart: Kennziffern der Mobilitat. Verkehrs– und Tarifver-bund Stuttgart, Germany, 1991. Р. 10.
Topp Harmut H. A critical review of current illusions in traffic management and control / Transport Policy. 1995. Vol. 2, N 1.Р. 33-42.
Transport Structure Plan Project Team. Second Transport Structure Plan, Part D. Government decision, transport in a sustainable society. Joint policy statement by several Ministries of the Government submitted to Parliament, The Netherlands, 1990.
Union Internationale des Transports Publics (UITP). Public transport: the challenge. 51st International Congress of Union Internationale des Transports Publics (UITP), Paris, France. Brussels, Belgium: UITP, 1995.
Vepsalainen S., Pursula M. Developing transport policy to raise the market share of public transport in Helsinki. Proceedings of Seminar C, European Transport Highways and Planning, 20th Summer Annual Meeting. University of Manchester and Institute of Science and Technology, UK, 1992.
Verband offentlicher Verkehrbetrieve (VOVG), Deutscher Stadtetag, Deutsche Bundes-bahn. Gemeine-Verkerhrs-Finanzierung fur Busse und Bahenen 1967-1986. Koln, Germany.
Wynne George G. Transit managers gain perspective on European systems / Passenger Transport. 1995. (July 3). Р 7.
YTV (Helsinki Metropolitan Area Council), Ministry of Transport and Communications. 1994. Helsinki metropolitan area Transportation System, 2020. Helsinki Metropolitan Area Series a. 1994:3. Helsinki, Finland: YTV.
Глава 5
Ходячие предрассудки по поводу городских транспортных систем
Политические решения, определяющие пути развития городских транспортных систем, и в особенности решения о роли, которую должны играть в этих системах различные виды транспорта, являются предметом широких дискуссий в большинстве городов мира. Споры идут по таким вопросам, как «легковые автомобили или общественный транспорт», «автобусы или рельсовые виды транспорта», «LRT или метрополитен», «строительство автомобильных магистралей или повышение эффективности использования улично-дорожной сети».